|
June 25, 2006 - Day 5 - Week 12
- Testing
I have had my blood tested more
in the past 90 days than in my 63 years combined. I
thought that chemo therapy was to be the only time I
was going to have a needle inserted into my hand or
arm, but boy I was mistaken. Testing, I have come
to find out, is as important as the treatment
itself. Blood is taken and analyzed to determine if
the regimen is working and my blood count is
remaining normal.
I have been and will continue
to be tested throughout the eight months and
probably indefinitely.
Tests are good for they measure
progress. In school we all accepted that Miss
Fielding our 3rd grade teacher would test
our math and English proficiency and from that time
on tests were an integral part of our learning
experience. I am resigned to the fact that the tests
I will undergo will determine, to a significant
degree, my future.
With some irony, I have been
interested in the testing of chemicals that have
been produced since the 2nd world war.
This fascination began with a conversation with
David Hall in 1992. This agri-business inventor
from Australia told of his declining health and use
of agricultural chemicals on his 100,000 acres he
had under cultivation. This convergence led to his
inventing a non-chemically based fertilizer called
Eco-Min.
I began acutely aware that the
EPA’s Toxic Substances Control Act Inventory
consists of 75,000, yes thousand, registered
chemicals and only approximately 3% have been tested
for their possible carcinogenicity. That is
correct. Chemicals are produced but few ever are
scrutinized for their possible damaging impact to
the human’s internal eco-system. Testing is minimal
and not mandated for the majority of chemicals that
enter into our water, air, soil, plants, lawns,
trees, etc. etc. etc.
The same EPA inventory also
notes that around 6.5 billion pounds of toxic
chemicals, “including nearly 100 million pounds of
carcinogens (identified experimentally and/or
epidemiologically) are discard by industry into the
environment annually.”
My body is perhaps housing
minute amounts of hundreds if not thousands of these
same chemicals. But, what is a person supposed to
do? We can wear a breathing apparatus, distill our
drinking water, and eat only certified organic food
for the rest of our lives, but that is neither
practical nor possible.
As you may recall I addressed
the issue of our having become a chemical culture in
earlier writings, but now I recognize that the issue
also has to do with the importance of testing. In
the future, which for me is now, the real issue may
be not me being tested, but the chemicals produced
by industry being tested more thoroughly.
Since childhood we have all
learned to accept testing as a necessary and vital
part of life. Let’s use the precautionary principle
and demand that nothing can be introduced into our
environment unless it is tested. This would become
perhaps our first line of defense in developing our
cancer prevention strategy. Just a thought!
Back to Week
12 |